home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
1095.doc
/
001568_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Sat Oct 28 22:19:06 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-11-07
|
2KB
Received: by mail.webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA010853946; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 22:19:06 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
Received: from ix10.ix.netcom.com by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA010793941; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 22:19:01 -0700
Received: from by ix10.ix.netcom.com (8.6.12/SMI-4.1/Netcom)
id WAA18593; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 22:10:33 -0700
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 22:10:33 -0700
Message-Id: <199510290510.WAA18593@ix10.ix.netcom.com>
From: ebain@ix.netcom.com (Elliot Bain)
Subject: Re: SUBST and WinNT - How?!?
To: Elfwork@aol.com
Cc: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Sender: owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
You wrote:
>
>The question remains:
>
>If I'm not supposed to do the network thing, _how_ do I SUBST a drive letter
>under NT?
>
>Thanks,
>Erik Flom
>--
If you weren't an NT guru when you decided to get your system, you probably
didn't set up your system to be Lightwave friendly by having a partition that
you could give a nice network drive letter to.
If you're going to be running just a handful of nodes, I doubt you'll take much
of a performance hit by "doing the network thing". Most of the WinNT books tell
you to start being concerned with optimization when you get up to 20 nodes on a
network.
I haven't been able to reliably measure the performance hit on a 2-computer
network.
Maybe someone can give us empirical data that will show otherwise. I'd really
like to know.
Elliot Bain
--
ebain@ix.netcom.com (Elliot Bain) sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com